( Updated : October 23, 2021 )

🔥 DOWNLOAD LINK

Ritwik Mitra | Game Rant The Best Valheim Mods | GameWatcher The best Skyrim mods in | PC Gamer
Loading... The Best Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord Mods gamerant.com The Best Valheim Mods How a screenshot started a fight that took over Reddit The best Skyrim mods
Reddit is the place where people come together to have the most authentic and interesting conversations on the internetвЂ”Where gaming communities. Reddit is an American social news aggregation, web content rating, and discussion website. Submissions with more upvotes appear towards the top of their subreddit. Yes, I'm a #KingField shipper The 7D2D Mod launcher provides an effortless way to play your favourite mods for 7 Days to Die, while keeping them updated. God Of War: The Leviathan's 10 Best Runic Attacks, Ranked 9 Unpopular Reddit Opinions About Attack On Titan The 10 Best Mods For 7 Days To Die. 7 Days to mine is a large zombie apocalypse mod, based on the 7 Days to Die game by The Fun Pimps. Survive in a world full of ruins, abandoned cities. Our gigantic guide to some of the best mods for Skyrim you can install today. 7 Days to Die Alpha 17 e Gun Mod Schematics and Crafting , die days alpha gun perk 7 Days to Die REDDIT REDDIT Review Free Download Mods, die days mods. He said he's not a "top mod" of any popular subreddit, meaning he can't do much Users, mods and admins have been arguing since Reddit's earliest days. Here is our list of the best Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord mods you can find on PC. 23 days ago | 2 comments | By Bogdan Robert Mate?. 15 days ago | By Bogdan Robert Mate?. The Best Valheim Mods. The first months of Early Access turned out great for Viking survival game.

Users and mods have always fought on Reddit. But when a group of "PowerMods" was accused of having too much control, the ensuing brawl hit every corner of the platform. Evan Hamilton, who runs Reddit's community team, said the goal is to "allow people to really build and curate the experience they want to have on the platform, and have some ownership, right? As with anything on Reddit, it's hard to know exactly how it all started. But the fight that has consumed the platform in recent weeks definitely started well before it went viral. The post was simple: a screenshot of a table, listing popular subreddits in one column and moderators in another. It was titled "92 of top subreddits are controlled by just 4 people. But that fact paled next to the post's ominous subtext: These are the people who run Reddit. And they have way too much power. Over the next several weeks, the list rocketed around Reddit. The post promptly went viral вЂ” at one point it was among the most popular posts on Reddit. That was May 12, which was approximately when things went haywire. A pattern took hold: The list gets posted and then deleted вЂ” sometimes because it doesn't follow subreddit rules, other times because it causes uncivil conversations, or for no stated reason at all вЂ” and then gets posted somewhere else. The dispute, both about the post itself and the way the post has been handled all over Reddit, has turned into a brawl between the platform's users and its moderators. One of the most popular versions of the PowerMods list that's been passed around Reddit in recent weeks. Screenshot: David Pierce. At its core, what's happening on Reddit feels evocative of this moment on the internet вЂ” and society вЂ” as a whole: a deep mistrust of authority yields a relentless and potentially destabilizing search for the secretly powerful hand keeping people down. In this case, some users say they've identified a cabal of "PowerMods" who control everything that happens on Reddit and manipulate the platform to their advantage. Moderators say they're receiving death threats because of a misleading list and for simply trying to do their part to make Reddit better. When Reddit's corporate team steps in, it only seems to make things worse. Reddit's approach to content moderation has always been both unusual and central to its building of community. It gives users the right to set their own rules and the tools to enforce them. This kind of drama is hardly new to the platform, but something about this instance feels different. It certainly did to Cyxie: The massively prolific poster and moderator, who had been on Reddit since and was helping oversee more than subreddits, abruptly deleted his account in the midst of it all. And more than one person I spoke to believes the ordeal has proven that something about Reddit is fundamentally broken. Most social platforms have an established set of rules and a three-pronged approach to enforcing them. There are the automated tools, designed to catch most bad content before anyone sees it. There are the reporting tools, meant to make it easy for users to report rule-breaking. And there are the teams of contractors, reviewing everything and making decisions. They decide what stays, what goes, what gets buried. Reddit isn't like that. Reddit is less a single platform and more a loose confederation of platforms, each with its own user-created norms. Evan Hamilton, who runs Reddit's community team, described it as similar to the United States. Beyond that? Hamilton said Reddit's goal is to "allow people to really build and curate the experience they want to have on the platform, and have some ownership, right? Practically every subreddit, once it hits a certain size, develops its own rulebook. No two are alike: You can have a "Game of Thrones" subreddit that doesn't allow memes, serious discussion only, and a competing one where memes flow like Dornish reds. Some are ruthless about formatting and style, others couldn't care less. The users responsible for enforcing these rules and getting the best out of their subreddit are the moderators, or mods. By default, the creator of a subreddit becomes its moderator, and from there it's easy to add and remove new mods and control their permissions. Moderators can have widely varying capabilities, from total authority over the subreddit to something like a backstage pass to watch others perform. Some subreddits have one or two, others have dozens. The first thing you need to understand about moderating, he said, is that nobody does it alone. Pretty quickly, Allam started joining more communities, posting more stuff, and discovered he had a knack for knowing what people might like on Reddit. He started seeing things he posted make it into news stories and onto TV shows. Meanwhile, Reddit started to consume his life. You could call him the most popular person on Reddit. Even before he started modding, Allam saw first hand how immersed in suspicion Reddit can be. He'd join subreddits, he said, and moderators would instinctively throw him out: He was posting so much they assumed he was a bot or a corporation masquerading as a single person. After a time, though, he got to know some of the moderators personally, and they brought him on board. He started in smaller communities, eventually building to bigger and bigger ones. At his peak, Allam guessed, he was moderating about communities. What does it mean to moderate a community? It depends. Some moderators are active, taking down posts, enforcing the rules, guiding the community. Others are more hands off. For the most part, Allam said, modding is thankless and often horrific. He said he's talked with suicidal users, woken up to an inbox full of child pornography. And it's all done on a volunteer basis. He's not always sure why he keeps coming back. Much of the work of moderating a subreddit doesn't actually happen on Reddit. It happens in email and Discord but mostly in Slack, where the moderators can discuss policies and specific decisions. Sometimes a subreddit will get its own Slack workspace, but more recently mods have been joining a single space for all moderators and creating private channels for each community. In most cases, even the Slack is run by mods. The mods do have frequent contact with Hamilton's staffers at Reddit, who are known as "admins" and function sort of as the grown-ups in a kids show: They don't show up often, but when they do, you know someone's in trouble. Knowing all this, consider the implication of a list that says five moderators essentially control Reddit. These five people are surely running the show in Slack, telling others how to run their communities, making everyone play by their rules and adhere to their values. One not-unpopular theory held that there's no way one person could be this active вЂ” some of these mods must be run by corporations or governments. Maybe from Russia or China. In the same thread, a user named notevengonnatryffs neatly summed up a broad feeling on Reddit right now. Any wizard behind the curtain must be dragged out into the open. This, maybe more than anything, is what differentiates Reddit from so many other social platforms. All have similar moderation issues вЂ” just this week, YouTube was criticized for automatically censoring comments deemed anti-China, as was Twitter for leaving up tweets by President Trump about Joe Scarborough that seemingly violate the rules. But in most cases, there's no one to rage at other than a faceless corporation or an unreachable CEO. On Reddit, the boogeyman has a name and an inbox. Users, mods and admins have been arguing since Reddit's earliest days, of course. As Gallowboob, Allam has been accused of deleting and reposting other users' content, just for the karma. He denies doing so. Once, Allam said, he posted an animation of a new Netflix logo he thought was cool, and instantly the community assumed he was a paid shill for the company. The response got so bad that Allam emailed Netflix, begging the company to acknowledge he hadn't been paid. There have been cases in which prominent users were being compensated, of course вЂ” and Reddit never forgets. The PowerMods list first crossed Allam's radar when a long-term Gallowboob troll posted it. Then it began to show up on other subreddits, Discords and 4Chan boards, where users would encourage others to post it themselves. They figured eventually moderators wouldn't be able to keep up. And with every deleted post or suspended user, the vitriol got worse. Then, Allam said, his friend Cyxie made a crucial mistake. Cyxie didn't respond to multiple requests for comment. He used one of Reddit's automatic moderation bots, a tool designed to combat spam вЂ” people selling T-shirts or posting the same link over and over вЂ” that can be used to quickly ban someone from all of a mod's communities. Cyxie happened to moderate a lot of communities. Which only made things worse. I believe it was this ardent rule-breaking, coupled with Reddit's ignorance of it, which drew people to my cause, right up to my baseless suspension. For a while, Reddit's community team didn't think much of the drama. Mods were sending new posts containing the list вЂ” and the harassment the posts were causing вЂ” to admins in huge volume. That's apparently what led Cyxie to delete his account entirely. Eventually, a Reddit admin named Sodypop weighed in on the PowerMods issue. We expect our users and moderators to abide by our site-wide rules and will continue to take action against anyone breaking these rules. It wasn't enough for Allam. Meanwhile, the post continues to spread, its implications more powerful every time it gets removed. While Allam didn't delete his account, he did take an extended break from Reddit. He's only posted once in the last three weeks, a cute cartoon with the title "Hardcore mental health check for all. But after it all, he's still on Reddit вЂ” something about the platform, and the drama, is irresistible. And he's trying this interesting thing: Every time he's tasked with deciding whether to take down a post, Allam has taken to polling the subreddit. Upvote if you want it to stay, downvote if you want it gone. In a new way, Reddit is being allowed to moderate itself. Allam isn't confident this latest experiment in gatekeeping will work, but he's giving users what they always said they wanted. Now they'll see what that looks like. David Pierce pierce is Protocol's editor at large. He owns all the phones. On this episode of the Source Code podcast : Issie Lapowsky and Ben Brody join the show to talk about the latest in a string of rough weeks for Facebook, including Frances Haugen's congressional testimony and Facebook's surprisingly aggressive pushback. Future-proof your organization by revolutionizing your talent acquisition and training strategies. The pandemic has forced many business leaders to realize that the skills their organization will need in the future will not be the ones they've needed in the past. The quick shift to working remotely exposed the gaps in the capabilities of many organizations and their people. It's also led to employees demanding more autonomy and wanting to engage in more strategic work. At the same time, more companies are automating day-to-day tasks, which provides their staff with more time to innovate and focus on growing the company. With that in mind, organizations are now looking for people who have a mix of soft, technical and digital skills, according to PwC's Talent Trends report. Going forward, those soft skillsвЂ”вЂ”critical thinking, clear communication, empathy and moreвЂ”вЂ”will become increasingly important. That problem will likely only increase as the definition of work, and the needs of employees, evolve in a post-pandemic environment. There are three main ways businesses can manage skills shortages: hire new talent, reskill current staff or upskill employees. Here's the breakdown of each approach. For companies, it's easier to close skills gaps through upskilling because employees are learning how to deftly use digital tools and are developing a better understanding of the business, its changing processes and the jobs that will be needed for the future. Companies often hire new talent to acquire the skills they need, rather than training their current staff. It may seem like the natural solution, but there are potential issues with this approach. These days there simply aren't enough people in the market with the skills most organizations need. Even if you can find talent with the experience you need for your business, those skills may not evolve as quickly as your company does. At that pace, even new hires will require training more frequently and within a shorter period of time. It can also cost companies thousands of dollars to hire a new employee, in addition to the time spent trying to find the right person. Beyond that, there's an additional productivity gap between onboarding and integrating those new employees into your organization. It is important to take into consideration that an employee who's worked for your organization for years has an in-depth understanding of both your culture and your customers. Their institutional knowledge makes them comfortable with your corporate structure, adept at using your company's tools, systems and the vocabulary that may be unique to your company. Training can deliver huge benefits to the organizations that do it well. But while both are important, they mean different things. Reskilling involves teaching employees new skills so they can perform different jobs in the future. It often requires looking for people with "adjacent skills" that are close to the new capabilities your organization needs. Reskilling provides a learning experience that enables a lateral move from one job to another. Upskilling goes further than reskilling by delivering continuous education that allows your people to advance their careers in more meaningful ways. It's more focused on helping staff think strategically, critically and holistically, across the entire organization, while teaching them how to use tools that can help automate day-to-day tasks. These automation efforts can free up time for employees to try new roles and focus on strategic objectives. This allows your people to take an active role in driving innovation and transformation. You're also teaching employees how to learn, which makes your staff more resilient and much better prepared for an accelerated pace of change. When you consider whether you will need to upskill, reskill or hire, the answer may be "all of the above. Over that time, human labor is expected to be increasingly complemented by new technology, rather than replaced by it. The number of jobs that require creativity, innovation and empathy will likely rise, as will the need for information technology skills. No organization can make itself entirely future-proof, but by improving your talent acquisition process and creating a culture of ongoing learning, you can prepare your employeesвЂ”and your businessвЂ”for the workplace of tomorrow. To do this, you need a platform that can help you quickly identify skill gaps and find upskilling and reskilling opportunities. The right solution can help you fill those gaps faster and more cost-effectively than hiring ever could. PwC has long believed in upskilling, which, for us, involves citizen-led innovation. We continue to upskill our entire global network by developing and sharing technologies to better support our clients. Our employees are increasing their digital acumen as work changes and applying their new skills right away. To date, PwC staff have used their newfound skills to build over 6, automations , visualizations and bots. Our employees have downloaded these digital assets more than 5 million times and have automated more than 6. ProEdge is an option to consider since it addresses many of the challenges that CEOs are concerned about. It's an end-to-end workforce planning and upskilling platform designed for digital business transformation and citizen-led innovation. It can accelerate the upskilling journey, close skill gaps from within and help organizations stay competitive by giving people the experience they need to innovate at scale. This unique platform allows you to pinpoint critical skill gaps and effectively help close them with automatically generated personalized learning pathways. Leading curated content, coursework and hands-on learning empower your workforce to make an immediate impact through citizen-led innovation. Access to digital tools enables solution-building that scales across teams and quickly translates to the automation of an employee's day-to-day tasks. This is how ProEdge helps your people to perform at their highest level: giving them the power to help transform your entire organization. Richard Branson once said , "If you want to be a millionaire, start with a billion dollars and launch a new airline. For a long time, conventional wisdom вЂ” the kind you picked up in MBA programs вЂ” said the same was true of the automotive industry. Why would anyone want to enter an industry with high fixed costs, fierce competition, supremely complex supply chains, stifling regulation and razor-thin margins? The answer, for a long time, was that nobody did. Then Tesla broke into the automotive market and challenged this notion, but only to an extent. Since its founding in , Rivian has set out to prove that there's room for more than one newcomer in the automotive industry RIP Nikola. Rivian shipped its first batch of electric trucks in September Even so, the road to profitability is long and winding and did anyone see a sign for the next charging station? It also warned investors that it will likely "continue to incur operating and net losses in the future while we grow. Rivian released its S-1 on Oct. The company is believed to be targeting an IPO date around Nov. Rivian was founded in by RJ Scaringe, who had just completed his Ph. The company initially set out to build an electric sports car, but in early switched focus to electric SUVs and trucks. Scaringe explained at the time that electric sports cars wouldn't allow Rivian to "deliver the level of change we felt we had the potential to drive. It began production in its first factory in Normal, Illinois this summer and has reportedly kicked off the search for its second factory location. Rivian is targeting two audiences with its vehicles: consumers with "adventure and active lifestyles" and enterprises seeking to electrify their fleets. At the end of September, 48, customers in the U. Rivian began making deliveries for the R1T in September and said it hopes to start delivering the R1S in December On the enterprise side, Rivian hopes to launch the RCV Rivian Commercial Vehicle , an electric delivery vehicle that it designed in collaboration with Amazon. In the S-1, however, Rivian discloses that its agreement with Amazon "may be terminated by either party with or without cause, subject to compliance with certain termination provisions. It wants to create an entire "vertically integrated ecosystem. The company said it designed its vehicle platforms "for applications beyond the launch versions of R1T, R1S, and EDV," which could involve becoming an automotive supplier. The Rivian ecosystem also entails having an entire software suite вЂ” including autonomous systems вЂ” continuously updated through the Rivian Cloud. The company has already started building out an electric charging station network, with Rivian Waypoints charging sites currently spread across 30 states. Rivian thinks it will eventually be able to launch "autonomous mobility as a service" and "energy as a service. In Rivian's version of the future, all of these services will cost a pretty penny. Rivian defines LTR lifetime revenue potential of services as "the revenue we can generate from a vehicle throughout its lifetime if the owner s were to use and subscribe to all the additional services and accessory products that we offer. Oh, and it also assumes that you'll only drive the vehicle for 10 years. Rivian is burning through money quickly and, until September , had no revenue to show for it. Rivian finally began generating revenue with the launch of the R1T in September However, the company warns investors it "will continue to incur operating and net losses in the future while we grow. Rivian faces three significant risks: over-reliance on Amazon, the complexity of automotive supply chains and potential for stunted adoption of EV trucks and SUVs in the U. Rivian has a lot riding on its Amazon partnership, but Amazon has relatively little at stake and can reduce its exposure to Rivian if necessary. Supply chains are a mess right now, and building an automotive supply chain from the ground up is already an extremely difficult task. These challenges could limit Rivian's output or result in increased production costs. Finally, Rivian still has to prove that there's a market for EV trucks in the U. This will be particularly difficult for an unproven manufacturer. Rivian didn't disclose its entire ownership structure, so it isn't possible to know exactly how much investors own in the company. New industry reports show a gaming business that's still big and growing, but not quite like it was in Looking ahead, these reports paint a picture of more tempered growth in more predictable fashion, but growth nonetheless. The growth of the video game industry over the past 18 months has in many ways reflected human behavior during the pandemic. When everyone was locked inside, we turned to gaming to connect with friends, pass the time and spend discretionary income no longer reserved for nights out and vacations. The industry boomed as a result, and this past year we've seen the effects reflected in record gaming investments and consumer spending. But new reports out this week on the financial state of the industry point to a more complex picture emerging. As expected, last year's growth hasn't been replicable as consumers become reacquainted with leaving their homes, returning to the office and traveling more often. Now, the industry has to chart a path toward a post-pandemic future that recognizes what worked during the pandemic, what won't keep working in the future and what's a more realistic expectation of gaming's new normal going forward. This reality check hasn't stopped investors, for now. Scores of companies that never dabbled in games before now want a piece of the fast-growing pie. The frenzied state of investments and industry consolidation illustrates just how confident the industry is that its best years are still ahead. But in many of the areas that count most for the short term, the industry's growth is starting to lag, and it's going to take careful maneuvering for game developers to weather the slowdown after last year's high. Spending on video games in the U. Those issues are expected to persist well into next year. NPD says that while the number of Americans playing games this year has dropped from last year, it's still much higher than it was in and those that are playing games still are doing so far more on average. And the growth continues, increasing to NPD makes an interesting observation in its report: One age group, the lapsed gamer aged 45 to 64, is helping contribute to new audience growth. And these gamers have continued to play more than other age groups," said NPD analyst Mat Piscatella. Mobile is another bright spot. While much of the global decline in game revenue this year can be attributed to contractions in the PC and console market, it's mobile holding the industry afloat with an estimated 4. And mobile's ascendance will continue, with mobile gamers making up the largest chunk of new audiences now expected to grow to 3. The game industry is already among the largest and most powerful entertainment sectors in the world, and it's only going to keep growing as more people play games, buy gaming hardware, try mobile gaming for the first time and spend more money more often on free-to-play games. But it's clear now more than ever the industry has only its brightest days ahead. By letting users build their own tools on Coda, and paying some of them, Coda's on its way to building a doc marketplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D. Coda, like many productivity software companies , wants to be the platform that workers use for everything. But now Coda has set its sights on more than that. It wants to become a marketplace. To do that, it needs help from the people who use it. Specifically the ones who like to build stuff. On Wednesday, Coda announced that its users can now build their own integrations and features into Coda. It calls these extensions "Packs," and they can be anything from a Google Calendar integration to a button that generates Yelp reviews. It used to be that only people at Coda could build these extensions. Now, anyone can build Packs, Mehrotra told Protocol, as long as they have a "basic understanding of coding principles. I can build. I have an insight,'" Mehrotra said. The first major step Coda took in this direction was the launch of a document gallery last April , allowing users to share fancy templates, ideas and advice. Plenty of other software companies also have template galleries, including Notion and Asana. Templates make tools easier to use, giving newcomers some guidance on how best to build their documents. On Coda's gallery, users will be able to browse different Packs in addition to docs. Mehrotra said Coda's not ready to allow monetization of docs just yet, but is working on it. Mehrotra was a longtime executive at YouTube, and in describing his goals for Coda, he drew comparisons between the two. Specifically, providing a space for anyone in the world with a computer to upload things they've made. He acknowledged, though, that it's not the perfect analogy. Coda's gallery fits in somewhere between the App Store and Medium, he said. Coda started as an "all-in-one document" company, a blank canvas where people could create and organize their lives. But with this expansion of Packs, they're hoping to become more than that. They want people to visit Coda and browse its gallery for new docs or tools. Mehrotra expects that people will produce a range of Packs, with some creators building internal tools for their companies and others building them for general consumption. To get a taste of what people want to make, Coda opened up the ability to build Packs to a few creators before the launch. One person made a way to calculate payroll directly from inside Coda. The CEO says he's not expecting Pack and doc builders to accrue large followings on Coda from the get-go. Instead, Mehrotra thinks people will bring their fans from elsewhere. But Coda's not focused on recruiting star power; it's opening the doors to anyone with an idea. In the coming weeks and months, it'll go through applications for funding from the Maker Fund, hoping to help the makers who need it. To give you the best possible experience, this site uses cookies. If you continue browsing. You can review our privacy policy to find out more about the cookies we use. Subscribe for free. Source Code. Next Up. The Inclusive Workplace. Tech Employee Survey. Return to Work Calendar. Power Index. The New Database. Rise of Retail Investing. Retail Investing. Transforming Small Business. Health Care. Quantum Computing. People How a screenshot started a fight that took over Reddit. Plus, whether the company's ultra-aggressive response will backfire. October 10, For more on the topics discussed in this episode:. Keep Reading Show less. October 7, Additionally, he launched Salesforce and client-focused centers of excellence, such as our Cybersecurity centers in Israel, Singapore and IndiaвЂ”вЂ”all to improve the way PwC serves its clients. October 8, Before joining Protocol, he worked for Business Insider Intelligence, where he wrote about Big Tech, telecoms, workplace privacy, smart cities, and geopolitics. What Does Rivian Do? Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He can be reached at nstatt protocol. Coda launched the ability for users to build their own integrations on Wednesday. See more. Most Popular. Everything you need to know about the Rivian IPO. Here come the crypto unicorns. Powering connected devices in the 5G era. Another mega-fine from Chinese regulators. Rohit Chopra is not into wrist slaps. October 08, EST. Apple plans to appeal the Epic App Store ruling. Apple is expanding in Los Angeles. Oportun drops bank charter application.